Fishing district

Šugovský potok

Salmonid (trout)No. 4-2730-4-1Šugovský potokBodrog basin and Hornád
Navigate

Fishing district boundaries: Šugovský potok od ústia pri meste Medzev po pramene a vodná plocha nádrží v Šugovskej doline.

fishing district length
5.1km
region
Košice Region
Aerial image of fishing district Šugovský potok with the line highlighted
Blue line: course of the fishing district (approximate). Orthophoto mosaic of Slovakia © GKÚ Bratislava, CC BY 4.0Google Maps

Fishing district Šugovský potok at a glance

Šugovský potok is salmonid (trout) fishing district no. 4-2730-4-1. The fishing district is 5.1 km long. The fishing district is managed by SRZ organization Medzev

Game fish of the fishing district (1):

By the water today

Is it worth going today? Conditions score, which species are biting today, the best window of the day, weather, pressure, sun, moon and solunar windows
–

The bite score for fishing district Šugovský potok is calculated for 4 game fish species from the weather right at the water, water temperature, light and air pressure. The forecast applies to the location 48.683° N, 20.891° E.

By the water now

Fishing conditionsFish activity indexOur calculation (0–100): the base is set by water temperature, adjusted by light, turbidity, oxygen, weather and other factors according to how well they are supported by studies. For each factor you can see the confidence and the source. A planning aid, not a bite forecast.

The score, the best window of the day and what pushes it up or down

Fishing conditions

Fish activity indexOur calculation (0–100): the base is set by water temperature, adjusted by light, turbidity, oxygen, weather and other factors according to how well they are supported by studies. For each factor you can see the confidence and the source. A planning aid, not a bite forecast.

Loading data…

Weather and forecast for fishing district Šugovský potok

Hour by hour, pressure and the next few days

Weather and forecast

Loading data…

Sunrise6:41Sunset15:59

Sky: sun, moon and solunar windowsSolunar periodsCalculated from the position of the Moon: major periods (about 2 h) around the Moon's passage above and below the horizon, minor periods (about 1 h) around moonrise and moonset. A scientifically unconfirmed theory: in a study of 361 fishing trips (Quigley et al. 2023) it did not predict bites. We treat it as a hypothesis with a weight of at most ±2 points.

Where the sun and moon are right now and when the best windows of the day will come

Sky: sun and moon

Solunar periodsCalculated from the position of the Moon: major periods (about 2 h) around the Moon's passage above and below the horizon, minor periods (about 1 h) around moonrise and moonset. A scientifically unconfirmed theory: in a study of 361 fishing trips (Quigley et al. 2023) it did not predict bites. We treat it as a hypothesis with a weight of at most ±2 points.

Drag along the axis to see where the sun and moon will be.

  • Sun
  • Month
  • Golden hour
  • Main period
  • Minor period

Sun

  • Dawn06:09
  • Sunrise06:43
  • Sunset15:58
  • Dusk16:32

The day lasts 9 h 15 min.

MonthMoon phaseAt full and new moon the gravitational effect is strongest. On a clear full-moon night predators and carp often feed at night, and the day after may be weaker.

Waxing crescent18% illuminated
  • Moonrise11:35
  • Moonset19:37

Full moon around 24 Nov, new moon around 9 Dec.

Windows of the daySolunar periodsCalculated from the position of the Moon: major periods (about 2 h) around the Moon's passage above and below the horizon, minor periods (about 1 h) around moonrise and moonset. A scientifically unconfirmed theory: in a study of 361 fishing trips (Quigley et al. 2023) it did not predict bites. We treat it as a hypothesis with a weight of at most ±2 points.

  • Main solunar period02:09–04:09
  • Golden hour (morning)06:13–07:43
  • Minor solunar period11:05–12:05
  • Main solunar period14:33–16:33
  • Golden hour (evening)14:58–16:28
  • Minor solunar period19:07–20:07

Solunar theory is not scientifically confirmed; we treat it as a supplement. The golden hour is the time around sunrise and sunset, when fish often bite.

Rules and permits

Am I allowed to fish here? Closed seasons, fishing hours, size limits, daily limit, permit price, where to buy it, contacts and the manager
Water typeSalmonid (trout)OrganizationSRZ organization Medzev

Fishing district Šugovský potok is classed as salmonid (trout) waters. Permits for fishing district Šugovský potok are issued by SRZ organization Medzev

Water typeLososový – pstruhový

Law and fishing rules at fishing district Šugovský potok

Closed season, fishing hours, minimum sizes and daily limit. For guidance only: check them in the fishing regulations of the fishing district

Closed season for all fish

Section 13, paragraph 1 of the Act

1 Oct – 15 Apr

fishing for all fish prohibitedoutside this period

Exception: on waters where huchen occurs, from 1 Nov to 31 Dec fishing for huchen is possible only with a huchen fishing permit (§ 13, para. 4 and § 19 of the Act).

The protection periods by species (below) apply independently of this closed season.

Daily fishing hours

§ 11 of the Decree

Applies only outside the closed season. Outside these hours fishing is prohibited (§ 14(b) of the Act).

April, September6.00 – 20.00 h

May, August5.00 – 21.00 h

Jun, Jul4.00 – 22.00 h

November, December7.00 – 19.00 h

Months missing from the table fall within the closed season. The hours in November and December on trout and grayling waters relate to the exception for fishing huchen (§ 13, para. 4 of the Act); check in the fishing regulations what may be caught at that time. On border waters the hours in the permit or the fishing regulations apply (§ 11, para. 2 of the Decree). The Act regulates night fishing in two wordings that seem to contradict each other at first sight, so always ask about it in the fishing regulations of the fishing district or the fishing guard.

Rods, baits and fishing days

§ 16 of the Act
Number of rods
1
Permitted methods
fly fishing, spinning
Hooks and baits
fly fishing at most 3 artificial flies, spinning one lure
Live or dead baitfish
prohibited
Fishing days of the week
at most 3
Ice fishing
prohibited
Other
prohibition of groundbaiting and of several baits (pastes, granules, pellets, cheese, worms, insects, roe)

This is a summary. For baits, hooks and groundbait also read the fishing regulations of the fishing district, because the user may tighten the conditions.

How many fish you may keep per day

§ 14 of the Decree
  • 1pcsBlue groupsterlet, Siberian sturgeon, wels catfish
  • 2pcsGreen groupeel, carp, burbot, zander, pike, tench, barbel, lake brown trout, brown trout, grayling (combined)
  • 4pcsYellow grouprainbow trout, brook trout, common nase, vimba bream; added to the green or blue group (at most 4 fish in total)
  • 5kgOther speciesfor example crucian carp, breams, dace and chub (combined); invasive species are not counted

The blue and green groups cannot be combined. The limit applies per day, also when fishing in several fishing districts, and once it is reached, fishing for that day ends. The species groups follow the SRZ interpretation of January 2026, not the text of the section directly. The fishing district user may set a lower limit in the permit, in which case the stricter one applies.

Protection periods by species§ 10 of the Decree

During this period the species must not be caught, even if the water type otherwise allows fishing at that time. It applies independently of the closed season for all fish.

1 Jan – 15 Mar
burbot
1 Jan – 31 May
grayling, spirlin, northern pike
1 Jan – 15 Jun
wels catfish, zander (pikeperch), Volga pikeperch
1 Jan – 31 Oct
huchen (in border waters 1 Jan – 31 Aug)
15 Mar – 31 May
common carp in carp waters (does not apply 1 – 31 May during competitions, nor on other water bodies); asp, chub, dace, ide, sterlet, Siberian sturgeon, tench, barbel, vimba bream, zope, white-eye bream, common bream, common nase
1 Sep – 15 Apr
brown trout, brown trout (lake form)
1 Sep – 28 Feb
peled

Some species are protected all year round (for example zingel and streber, lampreys, gudgeons, spined loaches, maraena whitefish, Carpathian barbel, sabre carp) and fishing for them is always prohibited. The full list of species is in the guide The fishing law, rule by rule.

Minimum sizes§ 12 of the Decree

The shortest length from which you may keep a fish. The fishing district user may raise the size, so look for the valid value in the permit and the fishing regulations.

Show as a list

Total length is measured from the front of the head to the end of the longest ray of the tail fin (§ 12, para. 4). No minimum size applies, for example, to sunbleak, Prussian carp, European perch, roach, stone loach and invasive species.

Before and after fishing

  • Carry your fishing license and permit while fishing and show them when checked (§ 12 of the Act). Check that they are valid.
  • Before you start fishing, write down the date and the fishing district number (no. 4-2730-4-1); after fishing, write down the number and weight of your catch (§ 14(d) of the Act). Fishing without a record is an offense.
  • Prohibited fishing methods, night fishing, competitions and other rules are covered in the guide The fishing law, rule by rule.

As of 6 Nov 2026: Act no. 216/2018 Coll. on fisheries (wording effective 1 Jan 2022) and Decree no. 381/2018 Coll. (wording effective 1 Jan 2019); we found no newer wording. The law may change; you can find the current wording on Slov-Lex (Act) and Slov-Lex (Decree).

Who manages fishing district Šugovský potok

The manager, the user and the organization that issues permits

Who manages the fishing district

Manager
Lesy SR, š.p. B.Bystrica
Fishing district user
SRZ
Organization
MO SRZ Medzev (Local SRZ organization)
Area
Eastern Slovakia
Purpose
Fishing district

Where to fish

Fishing district map, access, spots by the water, tributary mouths, hazardous places, stream gradient, bed and surrounding terrain
Length5.1 km51

The center of fishing district Šugovský potok is at coordinates 48.68323, 20.89111. The fishing district is 5.1 km long.

Map of fishing district Šugovský potok

Course of the water, access, parking and spots marked by the organization

48.68323, 20.89111 OpenStreetMap

The line shows the course of the fishing district according to the "Rybárske revíry" data 2026. Verify access points and exact boundaries on site.

51

Fishing spots index

Moderately varied stream

How many different habitats the stream offers: bends, alternating currents, tributary mouths and cover along the bank. A higher number means more places where fish hold, not more fish.

  • Meanders and bendssinuosity 1.1530

    The stream is rather straight or regulated; there are fewer pools in the bends.

  • Alternating runs and slack watergradient 34.9 ‰48

    The gradient is even; the stream has a similar character along its whole length.

  • Shade and cover along the bankShady, 41–70 %85

    Trees and bushes by the water give shade, roots and fallen trunks under which fish hold.

Spots by the water, tributary mouths and gradient

Where you can reach the water, where tributaries join and where there is danger

Confluences and risk spots

  • COV MedzevWastewater treatment plant · capacity 5,000 PE
    Details
    Load
    1,701 of 5,000 PE (34%)
    Treatment
    mechanical, biological, nitrogen removal
    Meets the requirements
    BOD₅, COD
    0.4 km
  • COV MedzevWastewater discharge point
    0.5 km

Spots within 3 km of the watercourse are shown.

Source: VÚVH (CC BY 4.0)Updated 12 Nov 2026 22:50

Elevation profile of the watercourse

Elevation profileHow the altitude of the watercourse changes downstream. It is calculated from a digital relief model (tens of meters), not from a water-level measurement, so it is approximate, especially for narrow streams.

Torrent A mountain stream with a steep gradient, cascades and a rocky bottom. The water is clear and cold; fishing requires a careful approach.

2503003504004505000 km2 km4 km
Elevation profile of the fishing district downstream: from 482 to 306 m a.s.l. over 5.1 km.
Downstream, from the upper end of the fishing district (left) to the lower end
Highest point
482 m a.s.l.
Lowest point
288 m a.s.l.
DropFallThe difference in altitude between the upper and lower end of the fishing district in meters. The greater the fall over a shorter length, the faster the water.
194 m
SlopeWatercourse gradientFall per kilometer in per mille (‰, meters per kilometer). Up to 2 ‰ is a slow lowland river, 5 to 10 ‰ a foothill river (grayling, trout), above 10 ‰ a fast stream.
38 ‰
SinuositySinuosityThe length of the watercourse divided by the straight-line distance between its ends. 1.0 is a straight watercourse; above 1.3 it meanders strongly. Meanders create pools under the banks and shallows in the reaches between.
1.15
Source: Open Topo Data (eudem25m)Updated 4 Nov 2026 12:40

Bed and bedrock according to maps

What the bed and banks are made of: rock, sediments and their effect on the water

Bed and bedrock

Bottom and bedrock (ŠGÚDŠ)The bedrock under the water according to the hydrogeological map of Slovakia at 1 : 50,000 (ŠGÚDŠ). It tells whether the surroundings are gravelly, sandy, clayey, muddy or rocky.

After rain the water quickly turns turbid and fish hunt more by smell.

  • Bedrock, stony 30%
  • Gravels 20%
  • Clays and loams 50%
Springs and outflows
2within 1 km

Springs and groundwater outflows bring cooler water into the watercourse in summer and warmer in winter; fish stay near them in extreme weather.

According to the geological map: fluviálne sedimenty: litofaciálne nečlenené nivné hliny, alebo piesčité až štrkovité hliny dolinných nív a nív horských potokov, holocén | tmavosivé až čierne fylity s laminami metasiltovcov, metapieskovcov a tmavých kry

The fishing district description states the bottom: gravel; the geological map shows something different, and the fishing district description is more precise.

The map shows the bedrock geology, not the exact bottom at the spot. The actual bottom material may differ, especially where sediment has been deposited.

Terrain in 3D

Loading the 3D terrain model…

Fish and catches

Which fish live here, what has been caught here, what is stocked, which species the water suits and what the fish eat
Documented species1

We record 1 game fish species in fishing district Šugovský potok. Of these, 1 species is in the stocking plan.

Catches from fishing district Šugovský potok

Catches from the fishing district

Nobody has recorded a catch in this fishing district yetBe the first: after approval it will also appear here in the ranking.
Species in the plan1

Stocking of fishing district Šugovský potok

What is stocked into the fishing district and how much

Fish stocking

Minimal stocking
Pp1 1000 pcs

Which fish this water suits

Suitability of the water for carp, trout and grayling species based on its properties

Water suitability for the fishing district type

Water suitability for the fishing district typeIndex 0 to 100: how well the properties of the water match the needs of trout, grayling or carp, depending on the fishing district type. It is not a bite forecast or a statement about which fish live there.
88from 100
Water of above-average suitability for trout

The water is in the top 22% of 461 trout fishing districts with data.

  • Best fit: stream zone

Reliability medium: we used 5 water data points; the rest are missing and are not part of the assessment.

  • Stream zoneLevel of evidence: Partially supported

    gradient 38 ‰, 385 m a.s.l. → trout zone

    Based on gradient and elevation, the stream lies in an area that corresponds to the trout zone. This is a natural zone for trout.

    What we know about it

    European streams are divided from source to mouth into zones with typical fish: trout, grayling, barbel and lowland; they are determined mainly by gradient and stream size (Huet 1959), and the zones can also be used to assess the condition of streams (Aarts and Nienhuis 2003). We estimate the zone from the gradient of the fishing district's line and its elevation; it is a simplification without stream width. A match between the zone and the fishing district type adds +1 to quality, a clear mismatch −1.

    Sources: Huet 1959; Aarts and Nienhuis 2003

    100
  • Water hardnessLevel of evidence: Hypothesis

    ≈ 9.4 °dH (1.7 mmol/l of calcium and magnesium), ŠGÚDŠ atlas

    Moderately soft water: productivity is average.

    What we know about it

    Water with calcium and magnesium is more productive and buffers acidity swings better: trout production was higher in calcareous hard waters (Almodóvar et al. 2006), and an index based on dissolved solids and depth predicts fish yield from lakes (Ryder et al. 1974). In Irish streams, however, geology did not change trout density (Lehane et al. 2004), and Downing et al. (1990) showed that production is related rather to primary production. Hence only ±1 point. Hardness comes from the ŠGÚDŠ atlas, not from a measurement in the fishing district; it replaces the separately assessed bedrock of the basin.

    Sources: Almodóvar et al. 2006; Lehane et al. 2004; Ryder et al. 1974

    82
  • Water acidity (pH)Level of evidence: Partially supported

    pH 8.2, ŠGÚDŠ atlas

    The pH is within the range in which fish commonly thrive.

    What we know about it

    Below about pH 6 fish suffer, and trout and grayling are more sensitive than cyprinids (Alabaster and Lloyd 1982); in acidic soft water, aluminum is released from the soil and damages gills (Gensemer and Playle 1999). The pH from the atlas is a model estimate, so the reduction is only −1 or −2, and only where we have no pH measurement (which is assessed by a separate factor).

    Sources: Alabaster and Lloyd 1982; Gensemer and Playle 1999

    100
  • MineralizationLevel of evidence: Hypothesis

    ≈ 272 mg/l, ŠGÚDŠ atlas

    Medium mineralization corresponds to productive streams and reservoirs.

    What we know about it

    Dissolved solids (mineralization) are related to the fertility of the water, which is why Ryder used them to estimate fish production in lakes (Ryder 1965, Ryder et al. 1974). Downing et al. (1990) showed, however, that primary production is a better predictor of production. It does not enter the score, only the suitability index.

    Sources: Ryder 1965; Ryder et al. 1974; Downing et al. 1990

    97
  • Metals in sedimentLevel of evidence: Partially supported

    1 elements among the highest 10% in Slovakia (ŠGÚDŠ atlas 1999)

    Metals in sediment can accumulate in benthic animals and fish; high values are often natural in ore areas.

    What we know about it

    The toxicity of metals to fish decreases with water hardness, because calcium competes with the metal for sites on the gills (Pagenkopf 1983). The ŠGÚDŠ atlas gives only the rank among streams, not a concentration comparable with a limit (MacDonald et al. 2000). In hard water we therefore rate metals more leniently, in soft water more strictly.

    Sources: Pagenkopf 1983; Gensemer and Playle 1999; MacDonald et al. 2000

    90

How this water would suit each type

  • Trout88
  • Grayling83
  • Carp50

The same water data evaluated against the requirements of trout, grayling and carp. The fishing district is registered as a trout fishing district; its type is highlighted.

The index 0 to 100 compares the properties of the water with the requirements of the species (60 is the neutral value, 100 the ideal). The verbal rating comes from comparison with other fishing districts of the same type, because most Slovak waters have good values for their species. The index does not affect whether fish really occur in the fishing district (that is decided by stocking and the manager). Hardness, pH and mineralization from the atlases are historical and model estimates. Only a small part of this feeds into the conditions score and fishing district quality (hardness ±1, atlas acidity −2 to 0, stream zone match ±1 to quality).

Fish food: aquatic insects

What fish eat in this water and how to choose a bait or fly

Aquatic insects

Aquatic insect swarming (iNaturalist)How many observations of mayflies, caddisflies and stoneflies people nearby recorded this month compared with the annual average. For fly anglers it hints at insect hatches.

Few insects November: 0.0× the average month

  1. Jan
  2. Feb
  3. Mar
  4. Apr
  5. May
  6. Jun
  7. Jul
  8. Aug
  9. Sep
  10. Oct
  11. Nov
  12. Dec
  • MayfliesMayflies0Mayflies: dry fly on the surface, especially at dusk.
  • CaddisfliesCaddisflies0Caddisflies: in the evening and at night by the bank; a nymph and a wet fly also work.
  • StonefliesStoneflies0Stoneflies: clean, cold streams, often already at the end of winter and in early spring.
Photo credits

0.0× the average month, 0 of 33 observations in the year, iNaturalist.

The observations are added by people from the surrounding area; they are not measurements at the water. They show when aquatic insects usually appear and are useful mainly for fly fishing.

Water now

Water level and flow, water temperature, ice on the surface, surface area, clarity, bloom and weed growth from satellite

Surface area, water clarity, algal bloom and ice at fishing district Šugovský potok are tracked from Sentinel satellites. Water temperature is estimated from the weather at the water.

From space: what the Copernicus satellites show

Sentinel-2 (optical) and Sentinel-1 (radar), updated roughly every 6 days

  • OvergrowthClean surface
  • IceNo ice

The watercourse is narrower than a satellite pixel (10 m). The values are therefore taken from a strip around the fishing district line and from pixels where water mixes with the bank, so they are only approximate and may also show the bank. The water surface area is not assessed for a watercourse, and estimates over the water appear in the image only where the watercourse is wider than a satellite pixel.

Sentinel-2 satellite image of the surroundings of watercourse Šugovský potok from 5 Nov 2026, Water (NDWI)
Sentinel-2. Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data 2026.

Surface overgrowth

Surface overgrowthThe share of the fishing district's area where the satellite sees green vegetation (NDVI index above 0.3): floating and emergent plants and reeds at the bank.
0 % of areaClean surface

The share of the area with green vegetation (plants on and just below the surface, reeds at the bank).

-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.51.01.527 Aug19 Sep12 Oct5 Nov
Surface overgrowth trend: from 27 Aug 14:00 to 5 Nov 01:00. Latest 0%, lowest 0, highest 0%.

A strip of reeds at the banks may also be counted, so values on small areas may appear higher.

Sentinel-2, 5 Nov 2026, 100% of the area cloud-free

Ice on the surface

Ice on the surfaceThe share of the area where the satellite sees ice or snow. It cannot determine the thickness or load-bearing capacity of the ice.
0 % of areaNo ice

The share of the area where the satellite sees ice or snow. Over the last 20 days the highest was 0%.

The satellite cannot determine the thickness or load-bearing capacity of the ice. Never go onto the ice based on this figure.

Sentinel-2, 5 Nov 2026, 100% of the area cloud-free

Data have been stored since 27 Aug 2026 (9 periods of 5 days); the charts show how they develop. Download history (CSV)

Estimates from satellite images with a resolution of 10 to 20 m, not a measurement in the water. They are affected by clouds, shadows, wind and banks. Do not use them to decide about swimming or going onto the ice. Data: Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data 2026, ESA, Copernicus Data Space Ecosystem. The procedure is described in the Methodology.

Water quality and cleanliness

Oxygen, pH and hardness, nutrients, pollution, wastewater treatment plants, landfills and contaminated sites nearby, groundwater
Quality indexGood quality70

The water quality index of fishing district Šugovský potok is 70 out of 100. It is based on 3 groups of data from measurements and registers in the area.

70

Water quality index

Good quality

Five pillars from measurements and registers. A pillar without data is not counted in the index, so check the data reliability too.

  • Oxygenno data–

    We have no measurement or register record for this pillar at this fishing district.

  • Water pollutionHarmful substances in groundwater (SHMÚ): pesticides (above the standard at 1 of 5 stations), highest value 70 times the standard56

    Metals, pesticides, PFAS and chlorinated solvents above the standard show the burden on the surroundings. The standards are set for drinking water and are stricter than the limits harmful to fish, so the reduction is small; metals can also come from rocks. PAHs are not counted in the score. Data reliability is 100% (8 stations within 10 km, the nearest 0.1 km, data from 2025); the adjustment was applied in full.

  • Nutrients and bloomno data–

    We have no measurement or register record for this pillar at this fishing district.

  • Pollution sources nearbyLandslides nearby: 4 landslides and slope deformations within 3 km, ŠGÚDŠ72

    Landslides deliver fine sediment to the stream, which clouds the water after rain and silts up salmonid spawning grounds. The register also lists old, settled landslides, so the reduction is only small.

  • Acidity and hardnessWater hardness: ≈ 9.4 °dH, ŠGÚDŠ atlas100

    A harder, calcium-rich basin gives more productive water, in which trout and grayling grow better.

Oxygen has a weight of 30%, water pollution 25%, nutrients and bloom 20%, sources nearby 15%, acidity and hardness 10%. Detailed measurements are in the cards below.

What water quality means for fish and fishing

Summary: water and oxygen, pollution and life at the water, and how much they shift the conditions score

What follows from this

Public sources in the conditions scoreData on oxygen, nutrients, reservoir depth, watercourse size, bottom, fish species and insect swarming slightly adjust the "Fishing conditions" score. Each adjustment is shown separately in the score breakdown.
−14−40+4+12−3
Public data about this water hardly change the activity score.
  • Biggest boost: Water hardness +1
  • Biggest deduction: Harmful substances in groundwater (SHMÚ) −2

We assessed 18 factors; 5 of them change the score. The adjustments range from −14 to +12 points so that they do not outweigh the weather and water temperature. They are counted in the score, in the ranking and in the filters.

Water and oxygen+1

  • Water hardnessLevel of evidence: Hypothesis

    ≈ 9.4 °dH, ŠGÚDŠ atlas

    A harder, calcium-rich basin gives more productive water, in which trout and grayling grow better.

    What we know about it

    Water with calcium and magnesium is more productive and buffers acidity swings better: trout production was higher in calcareous hard waters (Almodóvar et al. 2006), and an index based on dissolved solids and depth predicts fish yield from lakes (Ryder et al. 1974). In Irish streams, however, geology did not change trout density (Lehane et al. 2004), and Downing et al. (1990) showed that production is related rather to primary production. Hence only ±1 point. Hardness comes from the ŠGÚDŠ atlas, not from a measurement in the fishing district; it replaces the separately assessed bedrock of the basin.

    Sources: Almodóvar et al. 2006; Lehane et al. 2004; Ryder et al. 1974

    +1

Pollution−3

  • Nitrogen in groundwater (SHMÚ)Level of evidence: Partially supported

    nitrates typically 7.4 mg/l (standard 50), ammonium above the standard at 1 of 8 stations

    Groundwater reaches streams as base flow and carries nitrogen from fields and waste. Nitrates feed algae and contribute to nighttime oxygen crashes; nitrites are toxic to fish. Nitrites and ammonium can also be natural in deep groundwater, so at most one point is deducted for them. The data reliability is 100% (8 stations within 10 km, nearest 0.1 km, data from 2025), and the adjustment was applied in full.

    What we know about it

    Groundwater reaches streams as base flow. The typical nitrate value from stations within 10 km (moderate from 25 mg/l, significant from 50 mg/l, which is the drinking-water standard) indicates how much nitrogen the water brings: it feeds algae and contributes to night-time oxygen crashes (Camargo et al. 2005). Nitrites and ammonium above the standard at any station add one point, because nitrites are poisonous to fish (Lewis and Morris 1986); in deep groundwater they can also be natural, so only one point. The adjustment is multiplied by the reliability of the data.

    Sources: SHMÚ, groundwater; Camargo et al. 2005; Lewis and Morris 1986

    −1
  • Harmful substances in groundwater (SHMÚ)Level of evidence: Partially supported

    pesticides (above the standard at 1 of 5 stations), highest value 70 times the standard

    Metals, pesticides, PFAS and chlorinated solvents above the standard show the burden on the surroundings. The standards are set for drinking water and are stricter than the limits harmful to fish, so the reduction is small; metals can also come from rocks. PAHs are not counted in the score. Data reliability is 100% (8 stations within 10 km, the nearest 0.1 km, data from 2025); the adjustment was applied in full.

    What we know about it

    Metals and metalloids, pesticides, PFAS and chlorinated solvents above the standard at stations within 10 km. The standards are drinking-water standards and stricter than the limits harmful to fish, so the reduction is small: one point for one or two groups of substances, two points for three groups or for a value at least five times above the standard. Metals are poisonous to fish, more so in soft water (Pagenkopf 1983), and PFAS accumulate in tissues (Giesy and Kannan 2001); metals can also come from rocks. PAHs are not counted. The adjustment is multiplied by the reliability of the data.

    Sources: SHMÚ, groundwater; Pagenkopf 1983; Giesy and Kannan 2001

    −2

Watercourse, reservoir and bottom−1

  • Bottom by geologyLevel of evidence: Hypothesis

    Clays and loams, ŠGÚDŠ

    A fine-grained bottom is not typical of trout waters; the water clouds more easily.

    What we know about it

    Trout production is higher in limestone hard waters (Almodóvar et al. 2006), but in Irish streams geology did not change trout density and the structure of the channel decided (Lehane et al. 2004). The evidence diverges; the weight is small.

    Sources: Almodóvar et al. 2006; Lehane et al. 2004

    −1

Life by the water0

  • Aquatic insect hatchesLevel of evidence: Angling practice

    0.0× the average month, 0 of 33 observations in the year, iNaturalist

    Aquatic insects are scarce this month; food near the bottom matters more.

    What we know about it

    Anglers fish "by the insects" (dry and wet fly). A measured relationship between catches and insect hatches is not documented in our sources.

    0

Do not change the score

Data for these factors is missing or within the normal range:

  • Dissolved oxygen
  • Nutrients in the water
  • Water acidity (pH)
  • Water acidity from the atlas
  • Ammonium ions in water
  • Water temperature for local species
  • Surface water (SHMÚ)
  • Iron in groundwater
  • Chlorides in groundwater
  • Cold groundwater
  • Wastewater treatment plants
  • Watercourse size
  • Invasive species nearby

The rules are indicative and based on fishing practice and scientific studies; for each factor you can see how well it is supported. Weather, air pressure and water temperature affect the score more than this data does.

Water composition and pollution

Oxygen, nutrients, the nearest monitoring site and wastewater treatment plants

Water pollution

Water pollution (SHMÚ)Water quality indicators that fail the standards at the nearest monitoring site on the same watercourse in the SHMÚ yearbooks for 2022 to 2025.
Treatment plants within 2 km
1no unmet requirements
Polluted water in Slovakia: the worst places and polluters

The data comes from the SHMÚ yearbooks (surface waters 2022 to 2025). The yearbook lists the sites that failed the standard; a site missing from the yearbook is not considered clean. We determine the distance and the match of the watercourse name ourselves, so the assignment is indicative.

Wastewater treatment plants

Wastewater treatment plants near the fishing districtPlants within 2 km of the fishing district: overload, compliance with EU requirements and discharged load (BOD₅, COD, nitrogen, phosphorus in tonnes per year).
  • COV Medzev0.4 km from the fishing district · capacity 5,000 PE · mechanical, biological, nitrogen removal
    within the standard
    34% of capacity

Treatment plants within 2 km of the fishing district. The treatment plant need not lie upstream of the fishing district; we do not assess the watercourse at the plant. Load is the ratio of the pollution produced to the capacity of the treatment plant (PE = population equivalent).

Water chemistry, sediments and contaminated sites nearby

pH and hardness, trace elements in water and sediment, landfills and contaminated sites, boreholes with analyzes (ŠGÚDŠ)

510

Water according to the atlas

pH 8.2modeled estimate

water type Ca–HCO₃

Mineralization 272 mg/l, moderately hard water (9.4 °dH). Interpolation of measurements from the Geochemical Atlas of Slovakia, not a measurement in the stream.

Elements in river sediment

1 from 15elements in the top 10%

highest: Tin 5.29 mg/kg

Position of the highest-ranked element among the sample points on streams in Slovakia: percentile 91. Interpolation of the Geochemical Atlas of river sediments.

Trace elements in the stream water

1 from 10indicators in the top 5%

highest: Chromium 8.60 μg/l

Position of the highest measured value in the distribution of all surface water samples in Slovakia: percentile 96 (Sugovský potok).

Boreholes and groundwater analyzes

20boreholes within 3 km

287 water analyzes nearby

Of these, 20 have an archive report from Geofond. The boreholes are hydrogeological, geological, engineering-geological and other.

Environmental burdens and landfills

12sites within 3 km

1 environmental burden, 11 landfills

Nearest burden: Medzev – Strojsmalt, 940 m from the water. Proximity does not mean that substances leak from the site into the water.

The chemistry of water and sediments is a model estimate from interpolated maps of the Geochemical Atlas of Slovakia, not current monitoring or a measurement in the stream. The proximity of a contaminated site or landfill does not mean that substances from it leak into the water. The locations of the objects are on the map in the Geology and geophysics section.

Groundwater

Stations nearby and measured values

Groundwater nearby

Groundwater nearby (SHMÚ)Measured groundwater values from stations within 10 km of the fishing district (nitrates, harmful substances, ammonium, iron, chlorides) and the SHMÚ yearbooks.

Groundwater within 10 km (8 stations)

  • Hacava-sugov C.2Košice district – surroundings · spring · 0.1 km from the fishing district
    no exceedance in 2025
    2017 to 2025

    In the yearbooks 2017 to 2025 no exceedance of the standard is recorded at the station.

    Measured values, year 2025, sampling 2 Apr 2025
    • Nitrates5.7 mg/l
    • Ammonium< 0.01 mg/l
    • Nitrites< 0.01 mg/l
    • Iron< 0.002 mg/l
    • Chlorides1.1 mg/l
    • Aluminum10% of the standard
  • Medzev /nizny Medzev/Košice district – surroundings · borehole or well · 0.3 km from the fishing district
    natural substances only
    2017 to 2025

    Exceeded in 2025:

    • Manganese
    Measured values, year 2025, sampling 2 Apr 2025
    • Nitrates7.5 mg/l
    • Ammonium< 0.01 mg/l
    • Nitrites0.01 mg/l
    • Iron0.011 mg/l
    • Chlorides7.3 mg/l
    • Aluminum15% of the standard
    • Methylbentazone80% of the standard
  • Jasov-teplicaKošice district – surroundings · spring · 2.7 km from the fishing district
    no exceedance in 2025
    2017 to 2025

    In the yearbooks 2017 to 2025 no exceedance of the standard is recorded at the station.

    Measured values, year 2025, sampling 2 Apr 2025
    • Nitrates5 mg/l
    • Ammonium< 0.01 mg/l
    • Nitrites0.01 mg/l
    • Iron< 0.002 mg/l
    • Chlorides< 1 mg/l
    • Aluminum10% of the standard
    • MCPA (2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid)70% of the standard
Show 5 more
  • Tur.n.bod.-skalityKošice district – surroundings · spring · 5.0 km from the fishing district
    no exceedance in 2025
    2017 to 2025

    Last exceeded in 2024:

    • Prometryn
    Measured values, year 2025, sampling 24 Jun 2025
    • Nitrates7.4 mg/l
    • Ammonium< 0.01 mg/l
    • Nitrites< 0.01 mg/l
    • Iron< 0.002 mg/l
    • Chlorides1.5 mg/l
    • Aluminum15% of the standard
    • dimethachlor90% of the standard
  • RudnikKošice district – surroundings · borehole or well · 6.2 km from the fishing district
    natural substances only
    2017 to 2025

    Exceeded in 2025:

    • Ammonium
    • PH
    Measured values, year 2025, sampling 25 Mar 2025
    • Nitrates30.7 mg/l
    • Ammonium0.5 mg/l
    • Nitrites0.02 mg/l
    • Iron0.006 mg/l
    • Chlorides31.6 mg/l
    • Aluminum10% of the standard
  • Turnianske PodhradieKošice district – surroundings · spring · 7.0 km from the fishing district
    substances from human activity
    2017 to 2025

    Exceeded in 2025:

    • Total pesticides
    • Glyphosate
    Measured values, year 2025, sampling 6 May 2025
    • Nitrates8.1 mg/l
    • Ammonium< 0.01 mg/l
    • Nitrites< 0.01 mg/l
    • Iron0.04 mg/l
    • Chlorides6.6 mg/l
    • Mercury40% of the standard
    • glyphosate7,000% of the standard
  • Turna nad BodvouKošice district – surroundings · borehole or well · 8.9 km from the fishing district
    no exceedance in 2025
    2017 to 2025

    Last exceeded in 2019:

    • Manganese
    • Total iron
    • Aluminum
    Measured values, year 2025, sampling 17 Sep 2025 (2 samplings, the highest value of the year for each substance)
    • Nitrates6 mg/l
    • Ammonium< 0.01 mg/l
    • Nitrites< 0.01 mg/l
    • Iron0.005 mg/l
    • Chlorides2.4 mg/l
    • Aluminum15% of the standard
    • 1,2,4-triazole (azole pesticides)40% of the standard
  • Tur.n.bod.-zarnovKošice district – surroundings · borehole or well · 9.0 km from the fishing district
    natural substances only
    2017 to 2025

    Exceeded in 2025:

    • Manganese
    • TOC
    Measured values, year 2025, sampling 16 Sep 2025 (2 samplings, the highest value of the year for each substance)
    • Nitrates10.9 mg/l
    • Ammonium< 0.01 mg/l
    • Nitrites0.21 mg/l
    • Iron0.026 mg/l
    • Chlorides58.6 mg/l
    • Mercury30% of the standard
  • substances from human activity
  • natural substances only
  • no exceedance recorded

Groundwater reaches streams as base flow, so the connection to the stream at the fishing district is only indirect. Natural substances (iron, manganese, sulfates, conductivity) are not counted in the yearbook-based assessment.

The data comes from the SHMÚ yearbooks (groundwater 2017 to 2025).

Groundwater: measured values

Groundwater nearby (SHMÚ)Measured groundwater values from stations within 10 km of the fishing district (nitrates, harmful substances, ammonium, iron, chlorides) and the SHMÚ yearbooks.

A typical value from 8 groundwater stations within 10 km of the fishing district (nearest 0.1 km), measured in 2025. Closer stations carry more weight. This is groundwater near the fishing district, not a measurement in the watercourse itself. The standard is the limit that SHMÚ gives for the indicator (for drinking water); a value equal to the standard counts as an exceedance, as it does at SHMÚ. The label "somewhere above the standard" means that the typical value is below the standard but at least one station exceeds it; which one is shown on the tile. Fish are more sensitive to some substances than people are.

00.75

Ammonium

0.005mg/l

above the standard somewhere

Standard 0.5 mg/l. Range 0.005 to 0.5 mg/l, 8 stations. Above the standard: 1 of 8 (Rudnik, 6.2 km from the fishing district).

00.75

Nitrites

0.005mg/l

far below the standard

Standard 0.5 mg/l. Range 0.005 to 0.21 mg/l, 8 stations.

075

Nitrates

7.4mg/l

far below the standard

Standard 50 mg/l. Range 5 to 30.7 mg/l, 8 stations.

012

Oxygen

9.41mg/l

enough oxygen

Mark on the dial: 9 mg/l, the guideline for salmonid waters. Range 1.16 to 10.7 mg/l, 8 stations.

020

Water temperature

9.1°C

moderate

Range 8.6 to 15.9 °C, 8 stations.

510

pH

7.25

suitable for fish

Range 6.21 to 7.54, 8 stations.

08

Water hardness

2.22mmol/l

moderately hard

Range 1 to 4.16 mmol/l, 8 stations.

00.3

Iron

0.001mg/l

far below the standard

Standard 0.2 mg/l. Range 0.001 to 0.04 mg/l, 8 stations.

00.075

Manganese

0.001mg/l

above the standard somewhere

Standard 0.05 mg/l. Range 0.001 to 1.96 mg/l, 8 stations. Above the standard: 2 of 8 (highest: Tur.n.bod.-zarnov, 9 km from the fishing district).

0375

Chlorides

1.5mg/l

far below the standard

Standard 250 mg/l. Range 0.5 to 58.6 mg/l, 8 stations.

0375

Sulfates

32mg/l

far below the standard

Standard 250 mg/l. Range 12.1 to 139 mg/l, 8 stations.

0188

Conductivity

38.4mS/m

below the standard

Standard 125 mS/m. Range 20.8 to 80.7 mS/m, 8 stations.

0150%

Metals and metalloids

10% of standard

below the standard

Highest: Mercury 0.4 µg/l (40% of the standard, 7 km from the fishing district). 8 stations.

0150%

Pesticides

80% of standard

close to the standard

Highest: glyphosate 7 µg/l (7,000% of the standard, 7 km from the fishing district). 5 stations. Above the standard: 1 of 5.

0150%

Solvents and benzene

0% of standard

not detected

Below the limit of quantification: substances from this group were not detected in the samples. 7 stations.

0150%

PAHs (combustion, petroleum substances)

0% of standard

not detected

Below the limit of quantification: substances from this group were not detected in the samples. 5 stations.

How it affects fish and the water
Ammonium
Ammonium ions are not very toxic in themselves, but depending on pH and temperature part of them turns into ammonia (NH₃), which damages the gills and stresses fish. The higher the pH and temperature, the more ammonia there is (Emerson et al. 1975). The repealed Directive 2006/44/EC gave a guideline of at most 0.04 mg/l of ammonium for salmonid waters and 0.2 mg/l for cyprinid waters.
Nitrites
Nitrites are toxic to fish: they pass through the gills into the blood and turn hemoglobin into methemoglobin, which does not carry oxygen, so fish "suffocate" even in oxygenated water. Salmonids are the most sensitive; chlorides in the water reduce the toxicity (Lewis and Morris 1986). Directive 2006/44/EC gave a guideline of 0.01 mg/l for salmonid waters.
Nitrates
Nitrates do not harm adult fish immediately, but they feed algae and plants and so contribute to over-fertilization and nighttime oxygen crashes. For sensitive aquatic animals (salmonids, amphibians, some invertebrates) Camargo et al. (2005) recommend keeping nitrates below 2 mg of nitrogen per liter, which is about 9 mg/l of nitrates.
Oxygen
Fish, especially salmonids, need a lot of oxygen. Directive 2006/44/EC gave a guideline of 9 mg/l for salmonid waters (in at least half of the measurements) and never less than 7 mg/l. Groundwater from deeper layers often has less of it; in the stream it is re-oxygenated only after it emerges.
Water temperature
Groundwater has an almost constant temperature throughout the year. Inflow from springs can therefore cool a stream in summer and warm it in winter, and such sections often serve as refuges for cold-water fish (Hayashi and Rosenberry 2002).
pH
Fish tolerate a pH of roughly 6 to 9 (Directive 2006/44/EC). Outside this range the gills are damaged and the toxicity of ammonia and metals changes.
Water hardness
Harder water (more calcium and magnesium) is better for fish: calcium protects the gills and reduces the toxicity of metals such as copper and zinc (Pagenkopf 1983), and keeps the pH stable. Soft water is more sensitive to metals and to acidification.
Iron
Iron is dissolved in groundwater at depth. When the water reaches the air, it oxidizes and precipitates as brown flocs that clog gills, cover gravel with eggs and invertebrates, and destroy shelters (Vuori 1995).
Manganese
Manganese is natural in deeper groundwater. For fish it tends to matter less than iron; the standard applies mainly because of the taste and color of drinking water.
Chlorides
Chlorides come from road salt, fertilizers and waste. The US EPA (1988) set 230 mg/l for long-term protection of aquatic life and 860 mg/l for short-term.
Sulfates
Sulfates are common in groundwater; they come from rocks (for example gypsum), fertilizers and mines. Together with chlorides they raise the mineralization of the water; the standard of 250 mg/l is set for drinking water.
Conductivity
Conductivity shows the total amount of dissolved salts. A higher value in groundwater is often natural (limestone, gypsum), but a sharp increase in a stream points to an inflow of salts from roads, mines or waste.
Metals and metalloids
Copper, zinc, nickel, cadmium and mercury are toxic to fish even at low concentrations, more so in soft water than in hard water (Pagenkopf 1983). The groundwater standard is set for drinking water, not for fish.
Pesticides
Pesticides get into groundwater from fields. The standard of 0.1 µg/l per substance (0.5 µg/l in total) is a drinking-water standard and is very strict; fish are usually harmed only by a much higher concentration. The value mainly shows how heavily the surroundings are burdened by agriculture.
Solvents and benzene
Chlorinated solvents (for example tetrachloroethene) and benzene come from industry, treatment plants and petrol stations. They are toxic and break down slowly in groundwater.
PAHs (combustion, petroleum substances)
PAHs are formed by combustion and petroleum spills. The standard for benzo(a)pyrene (0.01 µg/l) is very strict for drinking water because it is a carcinogen.

Sources

  1. Camargo, J. A., Alonso, Á., Salamanca, A. (2005): Nitrate toxicity to aquatic animals: a review with new data for freshwater invertebrates. Chemosphere 58, 1255–1267.
  2. Lewis, W. M., Morris, D. P. (1986): Toxicity of nitrite to fish: a review. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 115, 183–195.
  3. Emerson, K., Russo, R. C., Lund, R. E., Thurston, R. V. (1975): Aqueous ammonia equilibrium calculations: effect of pH and temperature. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 32, 2379–2383.
  4. Directive 2006/44/EC on the quality of fresh waters needing protection or improvement in order to support fish life (repealed in 2013; we give its values here only as an expert guideline).
  5. Vuori, K.-M. (1995): Direct and indirect effects of iron on river ecosystems. Annales Zoologici Fennici 32, 317–329.
  6. Pagenkopf, G. K. (1983): Gill surface interaction model for trace-metal toxicity to fishes: role of complexation, pH, and water hardness. Environmental Science & Technology 17, 342–347.
  7. U.S. EPA (1988): Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Chloride. EPA 440/5-88-001.
  8. Hayashi, M., Rosenberry, D. O. (2002): Effects of ground water exchange on the hydrology and ecology of surface water. Ground Water 40, 309–316.

About the fishing district and the watercourse

Location and length of the fishing district, character of the watercourse, river basin, the organization's description and historical satellite images
RegionKošice Region58

Fishing district Šugovský potok has the number 4-2730-4-1. The reliability of data about the fishing district is 58 out of 100.

Fishing district number4-2730-4-1

Location, character and river basin of fishing district Šugovský potok

Where the fishing district lies, what type of water it is, what its river basin is and what the organization writes about it

Location, area and nature protection

Characteristics

  • DepthDepthThe greatest depth from the fishing district description. Shallows warm up quickly and are rich in food; deep pools give shelter and a more stable temperature. 0.6 m
  • BottomBottomThe bottom material determines which fish live here and where they find food. Fish zones can be recognized by the bottom: rocky, gravelly, sandy to muddy. gravelly
  • Watercourse lineWatercourse lineThe shape of the watercourse seen from above. In bends there is a deep scour under the outer bank and a shallow bar under the inner one; a winding stream has more shelter and changes in depth. slightly undulating
  • ShadingShadingThe share of the water surface in shade. Shade lowers summer water temperatures and supplies insects and shelter; a sunny section warms up faster and becomes more overgrown. 60%
  • VegetationVegetationTree and herbaceous vegetation on the banks. Roots and branches create shelter, and leaves and twigs falling in provide food. It also determines where you can cast and where your rig gets snagged. alder, willow, spruce, poplar
  • Cross-channel structuresCross-channel structuresWeirs, steps and dams hold back water and stop fish from migrating. Below them a deep plunge pool with oxygenated water forms. none
What this means for anglersexplanation of the bottom, vegetation, watercourse line and other data of this fishing district
  • Depth: Shallow, up to 1 m

    It warms up and cools down quickly. Fish are shy; a quiet approach and a delicate rig help.

  • Bottom: Gravel bottom

    Well-oxygenated water and plentiful food (aquatic insect larvae). Typical of the grayling and barbel zones; gravel bars also serve many fish as spawning grounds.

  • Watercourse line: Slightly undulating line

    Gentle bends: on one section you will find both deeper scours and shallower bars.

  • Shade: Shady, 41–70%

    In summer the water is cooler, with more insects falling in and more shelter. It is often a good place for trout and grayling.

  • Vegetation: Willow

    Grows by the water; the roots stabilize the bank and create shelters beneath the surface. The branches hang over the water and provide shade and insects.

  • Vegetation: Alder

    A typical tree of stream and river banks. A dense root system creates undercut banks and shelters, and the leaves decompose quickly.

  • Vegetation: Poplar

    Tall, fast-growing trees. They provide shade and insects, and branches and leaves fall into the water.

  • Vegetation: Spruce

    Common in mountain and foothill streams. Year-round shade and cooler, often more acidic water.

  • Cross-channel structures: none

    Fish can move freely along the watercourse; the section is more continuous.

The explanation is general and based on the fishing district description in the data and on common fishing practice. Actual conditions on site may differ; check them before you fish.

River basin and reservoir

Reservoir depth (HydroLAKES)Average depth, volume and water retention time in the reservoir from the HydroLAKES database (WWF). The depth is estimated by a model from the surrounding terrain, so it is approximate.

Watercourse from the HydroRIVERS database matched with the fishing district, line deviation about 106 m

Catchment above the spotWatercourse size (HydroRIVERS)The catchment area above the spot, the stream order and the average flow from the HydroRIVERS database (WWF). It determines whether it is a stream, a river or a large river.
14 km²stream
Mean discharge
0.09 m³/smodel value
Stream order (Strahler)
1upper course, small tributary
Channel gradient
38 ‰Torrent

The data come from a global database with a coarser resolution (tens of meters), so they are only approximate for small waters. Depth and volume are model averages.

Historical images

Changes in the surroundings and nature from 2019 to 2025: how the banks, vegetation and landscape around the water change. The images switch automatically; you can also browse them by hand.

Aerial image of fishing district Šugovský potok from 2019
2019imaged 3 Jul 2019
Aerial image of fishing district Šugovský potok from 2022
2022imaged 30 Aug 2022
Aerial image of fishing district Šugovský potok from 2025
2025imaged 5 Jul 2025

Orthophoto mosaic of Slovakia © GKÚ Bratislava, NLC Zvolen. The year and day of imaging depend on the location, so individual years may differ in season and weather.

58

Data reliability

Measurements and estimates

What is measured right at the water for this fishing district, what is only partly supported, what is a model estimate and what is missing. The higher the number, the more you can rely on the indexes on this page.

  • estimate
    Water temperatureAn estimate from the air temperature of the last few days. The actual temperature may differ by 1 to 3 °C.
  • missing
    Water stageThere is no gauging station at this fishing district.
  • estimate
    Weather and pressureA forecast model for the fishing district's coordinates, not a measurement on the bank.
  • measured
    Clarity, bloom and iceSentinel-2 satellite, last usable image 8 days ago.
  • partly
    Water chemistryQuality assessment from the nearest SHMÚ monitoring site.
  • partly
    Fish in the fishing districtThe fishing district's stocking plan. Nobody has recorded a catch here yet.
  • partly
    Rules and permitsThe act, the decree and the list of fishing districts. Check local exceptions in your permit.
  • estimate
    Fishing district locationThe location is approximate, based on the description of the fishing district boundaries.

Geology and geophysics

Rocks under the water, faults and springs, radon and natural radiation, magnetic field, earthquakes, geothermal energy, mines and deposits, landslides

Rocks, faults, radon and geophysical measurements around fishing district Šugovský potok.

Ground under the water: geology, faults and radon

Bedrock, watercourse and springs on the map, values at the location of the water, geomagnetic activity and earthquakes. This is information about the environment; only small hypotheses marked with a confidence level (faults and rocks, geomagnetic storm) enter the score.

The bedrock map needs JavaScript to be turned on.

The map can be panned and zoomed; the ŠGÚDŠ layers are stored on this server. © State Geological Institute of Dionýz Štúr. Base map scale 1 : 50,000 (faults and geology); radioactivity and magnetics are coarser.

Values at the water spot

Values at the water spotBedrock radon risk, uranium, thorium, potassium, gamma radiation and magnetic anomaly at a single spot by the water (marked with a dot on the map).

Radon risk of the bedrock

medium

Common for most of Slovakia.

08

Uranium (eU)

2.5ppm

common

Typical background of the rocks.

020

Thorium (eTh)

9.3ppm

around the crustal average

Natural background of the rocks.

04

Potassium (K)

1.78%

around the crustal average

Natural background of the rocks.

0150

Gamma radiation

61nGy/h

around the world average

Natural background of the bedrock.

SVJZ

Magnetic anomaly (ΔT)

-24nT

below the average of the surroundings

Deviation of the magnetic field from the average of the surroundings.

The values apply to a single spot (marked with a dot on the map), not as an average of the whole watercourse or river basin. Radon is a natural tracer in groundwater; the map does not include radon in water, only the bedrock risk.

Mark on the dial: the average of the upper continental crust (uranium 2.7 ppm, thorium 10.5 ppm, potassium 2.3%; Rudnick and Gao 2003) and the world average of the natural outdoor dose 59 nGy/h (UNSCEAR 2000). The needle does not swing towards “good” or “bad”; it only shows where the value lies.

Elevated uranium or radon is only information about the rock. It has no proven significance for bites; it helps to read what bedrock the water comes from.

Faults and springs

Faults and springsThe distance to the nearest tectonic fault on the geological map and the number of springs nearby. Fissure groundwater flows out along faults.
250 m1 km3 km8 km

Nearest fault

up to 250 m

fault nearby

Tectonic fault on the geological map.

Springs and outflows

2

groundwater by the watercourse

Within 1 km.

covered by younger sediments

Fissure groundwater flows out of the bedrock along faults and at springs. It tends to be cooler in summer and warmer in winter than the water in the stream, so according to anglers' experience fish stay near such places in extreme weather (summer and winter islands of a more suitable temperature).

However, fresh fissure water can have little oxygen. This is anglers' experience, not a phenomenon measured at this fishing district.

Faults are from the geological map at 1 : 50,000. Springs come from a hydrogeological map that covers only some regions, so zero does not mean there are no springs there.

Geology nearby: rock, water, sediments, boreholes

Geology and geochemistry around the waterRock under the water, composition of water and sediments according to the atlases, radioactivity, geothermal potential, boreholes, old mine workings, deposits, burdens, landslides and gold in sediments, from ŠGÚDŠ maps and registers.
Medzev, žila Andreas – Complex iron ores (960 m from the water)Medzev, Kauligov vrch – Iron ores (2.4 km from the water)Hačava – Iron ores (3.0 km from the water)Štós, žila Pivering-lom – Complex iron ores (3.6 km from the water)Štós, žila Žalobka – Complex iron ores (4.0 km from the water)Medzev, žila Laura-Berta – Complex iron ores (4.0 km from the water)Jasov, žila Jób-Rozália – Complex iron ores (4.3 km from the water)Štós, žila Karin – Complex iron ores (4.4 km from the water)Medzev, žila Nanebovstúpenie – Complex iron ores (4.6 km from the water)Poproč, žila Fortuna – Complex iron ores (4.6 km from the water)Jasov, žila Fructuozus – Complex iron ores (4.7 km from the water)Medzev, žily Radivij, Radomír, Radovan a Ramon – Complex iron ores (4.8 km from the water)Medzev – Strojsmalt – SK200500FK (940 m from the water)Nižný Medzev VIII. – Vyšný Medzev – none (140 m from the water)Nižný Medzev VII. – Vyšný Medzev – none (830 m from the water)Nižný Medzev VI. – Vyšný Medzev – none (1.1 km from the water)Nižný Medzev V. – Vyšný Medzev – none (1.4 km from the water)Počkaj – Jasov – none (1.6 km from the water)Hačava I. – Hačava – none (2.0 km from the water)Nižný Medzev IV. – Vyšný Medzev – none (2.0 km from the water)Baňa Lucia II. – Vyšný Medzev – occasional (2.2 km from the water)Nižný Medzev I. – Vyšný Medzev – none (2.3 km from the water)Nižný Medzev II. – Vyšný Medzev – none (2.4 km from the water)Vyšný Medzev II. – Vyšný Medzev – none (2.9 km from the water)Medzev – Šugov – building stone – limestone (60 m from the water)Medzev – Počkaj – building stone – quartz porphyry (1.2 km from the water)Jasov – building stone – conglomerate (1.6 km from the water)Medzev – Kauligov vrch – Fe ores, Mn ores (2.4 km from the water)Jasov – building stone – quartz porphyry (2.5 km from the water)Hačava – Fe ores – magnetite, hematite (3.0 km from the water)Medzev – Pivering – building stone – quartz porphyry (3.5 km from the water)Luciabaňa – Michal, Fortuna – Fe ores – siderite (4.0 km from the water)Porče I – building stone – quartz porphyry (4.3 km from the water)Porče II – building stone – quartz porphyry (4.3 km from the water)Jasov – building stone – limestone (4.5 km from the water)Jasov – building stone – limestone (4.6 km from the water)Jasov – building stone – limestone (4.7 km from the water)Medzev – complex iron ores (4.0 km from the water)Jasov – general geology (2.1 km from the water)Kunia priepasť, Turnianske Podhradie – geomorphology (4.3 km from the water)Jasovská jaskyňa – paleontology (4.5 km from the water)Jaskyňa Skalistého potoka – geomorphology (4.8 km from the water)NIZNY MEDZEV – Landslides (1.2 km from the water)NIZNY MEDZEV – Landslides (1.7 km from the water)JASOV – Landslides (2.5 km from the water)NIZNY MEDZEV – Landslides (2.8 km from the water)Nižný Medzev – SHMÚ observation borehole (350 m from the water)Medzev – borehole for a waterworks (850 m from the water)Nižný Medzev – úzkoprofilový vrt s obyčajnou pitnou a ú (860 m from the water)Medzev – širokoprofilový vrt (Ø vŕtania nad 600 m (980 m from the water)Medzev – úzkoprofilový vrt s obyčajnou pitnou a ú (1.3 km from the water)Medzev – širokoprofilový vrt (Ø vŕtania nad 600 m (1.4 km from the water)Medzev – úzkoprofilový vrt s obyčajnou pitnou a ú (1.6 km from the water)Medzev – úzkoprofilový vrt s obyčajnou pitnou a ú (2.1 km from the water)Nižný Medzev – úzkoprofilový vrt s obyčajnou pitnou a ú (2.1 km from the water)Vyšný Medzev – širokoprofilový vrt (Ø vŕtania nad 600 m (2.4 km from the water)Jasov – štruktúrny vrt s obyčajnou vodou (nad 20 (2.7 km from the water)vodárensky využívaný a monitorovaný prameň – Groundwater springs (20 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (20 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (30 m from the water)prameň s monitorovaním výdatnosti – Groundwater springs (40 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (50 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (50 m from the water)vodárensky využívaný a monitorovaný prameň – Groundwater springs (60 m from the water)vodárensky využívaný a monitorovaný prameň – Groundwater springs (70 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (90 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (120 m from the water)vodárensky využívaný a monitorovaný prameň – Groundwater springs (130 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (210 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (220 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (230 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (280 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (330 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (350 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (510 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (590 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (610 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (700 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (720 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (730 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (740 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (780 m from the water)vodárensky využívaný a monitorovaný prameň – Groundwater springs (850 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (860 m from the water)vodárensky využívaný a monitorovaný prameň – Groundwater springs (870 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (870 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (910 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (910 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (960 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (960 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (980 m from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (1.0 km from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (1.0 km from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (1.0 km from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (1.0 km from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (1.0 km from the water)prameň – Groundwater springs (1.1 km from the water)Šugov- zberná studňa – source (70 m from the water)Medzev – Šugovská vyvieračka – source (780 m from the water)Medzev – Šugovská dolina, vodný zdroj – source (870 m from the water)Hačava, 500m Z od K701 – source (870 m from the water)Medzev, 2300m Z od K599 Halagos – source (1.4 km from the water)Jasov, 1600m SV od K438 – source (1.7 km from the water)Jasov, 900m SZ od K599 – source (1.7 km from the water)Jasov, 800m SZ od K599 – source (1.8 km from the water)Hačava, 1000m ZJZ od K902 č.d. 34 – well (2.4 km from the water)Hačava, 1100m ZJZ od K902 pri č.d. 44 – well (2.6 km from the water)Jasov, 600m S od K460 – source (2.6 km from the water)Háj, 800m ZSZ od K666 – source (2.7 km from the water)Jasov – prameň Teplica, prepad z vodného zdroja – source (2.7 km from the water)SZ okraj obce Hačava – source (3.0 km from the water)5 km

The line is the water of the fishing district, the light band is the 3 km zone in which boreholes, mine workings and burdens were searched for. The map shows the nearest objects (at most a few dozen from each register), not all of them. The points correspond to the position in the register; area objects are marked by their center.

Rock under the water

River alluvium67% of the water line

33% metamorphic rocks

Gravelly and sandy bottom and floodplains; the water is replenished from groundwater in the alluvium. Geological Map of Slovakia 1:50,000.

Gold in river sediment

0samples with gold

11 ore minerals in the sediment

No gold was found in river sediment samples within 1 km of the water. The samples do not cover every stream, so this does not mean there is no gold here.

Deposits and ore occurrences

26records within 5 km

26 ore occurrences

Geofond registers, the metallogenetic map and the mineral resources map.

Landslides and slope deformations

4areas within 3 km

Documented landslides in the Geofond register. A landslide into a stream can cloud the water and change the bed.

The data come from registers, maps and atlases of the State Geological Institute of Dionýz Štúr and describe the environment around the water. Proximity of a mine working or burden does not mean the water is polluted. The chemistry of water and sediments is a modeled estimate from interpolated maps of the Geochemical Atlas of Slovakia, not current monitoring or a measurement in the stream.

Detailed geology and geochemistry of the whole stream: rock under the water, water composition, elements in sediments, radiation, geothermal potential, metals, gold in sediment, mine workings, boreholes with analyzes.

Geomagnetic activity

Geomagnetic activity (Kp)The planetary Kp index (0 to 9) measures the fluctuation of the Earth's magnetic field. From 5 it counts as a geomagnetic storm. The last 48 hours and a forecast for 24 hours are shown.
09

Kp index

0.7from 9

quiet field

Latest measurement (13 Nov 2026 19:00). The dot on the dial is the highest forecast for the next 24 hours.

Highest forecast Kp in the next 24 hours: 1.7 (quiet field).

Kp (0 to 9) measures the fluctuation of the Earth's magnetic field caused by the solar wind. From 5 it counts as a geomagnetic storm. Fish, especially salmonids and eels, sense the magnetic field. That their bites depend on Kp has not been shown, though: these are anglers' observations and hypotheses.

The value is the same for the whole of Slovakia. It enters the activity score only during a strong geomagnetic storm (a hypothesis, −1 to −2 points).

Earthquakes nearby

Earthquakes nearbyTremors recorded within 150 km of the water in the last 30 days (GFZ GEOFON catalog).
S

Earthquakes nearby

0tremors

no tremors

Within 150 km over the last 30 days (from magnitude 0.0).

According to angling lore, fish (especially catfish and eels) react restlessly to tremors beforehand or stop biting. This is not reliably proven, and with weak tremors it is coincidence. People mostly do not notice deeper tremors from the Carpathians (for example near Komárno and Dobrá Voda) at all.

The GEOFON catalog is global; weak tremors near Slovakia may not all be in it. It is not counted in the activity score.

Data: © ŠGÚDŠ (geological, geophysical and hydrogeological maps), NOAA SWPC (Kp index), GFZ GEOFON (earthquakes). A link between the geomagnetic field, tremors or radon and fish bites has not been reliably proven, so they are not counted in the activity score. The method is described in Methodology.

Nature and hazards at the water

Wildlife, birds and plants around the water, dangerous and invasive species, what to watch out for

Wildlife, birds and plants observed around fishing district Šugovský potok.

Wildlife, plants and hazards around the waterWildlife and hazards by the water (GBIF)Game animals, birds, plants and hazards (bear, ticks, mosquitoes, giant hogweed) that people have recorded around the water. It is not part of the fishing conditions score and is for information only.

Species that have been observed or recorded around the water. Wildlife, plants and hazards do not enter the fishing conditions score and are for information only. The name of a species leads to its page.

DragonfliesWildlife

Dragonflies

many records
Most records: Jun.
About the species

Predatory insect. The larvae live underwater for several months to years; adult dragonflies hunt in the air above the water.

Grey heronBird

Grey heron

protected speciesquite a few records
Most records: April.
About the species

It stands in the shallows and lies in wait for small fish. It is easy to see along the banks of ponds and slow streams.

MallardBird

Mallard

quite a few records
Most records: April.
About the species

The most common duck; it nests by almost every water with bankside vegetation.

Great egretBird

Great egret

protected speciesquite a few records
Most records: April.
About the species

A large white heron that hunts fish and frogs in the shallows. In Slovakia its numbers are rising, and in winter it can also be seen by watercourses.

Fire salamanderWildlife

Fire salamander

protected speciesquite a few records
Most records: September.
About the species

Black with yellow spots. Lives in deciduous forests by clean mountain streams; the larvae develop in the stream.

Mute swanBird

Mute swan

protected speciesquite a few records
Most records: April.
About the species

A large white waterbird that nests by slow waters, reservoirs and ponds with vegetation.

MayfliesWildlife

Mayflies

quite a few records
Most records: October.
About the species

An insect with aquatic larvae. Adults live only briefly and hatch all at once in swarms.

Great crested grebeBird

Great crested grebe

protected speciesquite a few records
Most records: April.
About the species

A diving waterbird with a crest on its head. Hunts small fish and insects, nests on a floating nest in the reeds.

White-throated dipperBird

White-throated dipper

protected speciesquite a few records
Most records: May.
About the species

A small bird that dives and runs along the bed of rapids after insect larvae. Nests by clean mountain streams.

Common toadWildlife

Common toad

protected speciesquite a few records
Most records: Jun.
About the species

The largest native toad. In spring it migrates to water, where it breeds.

Grass snakeWildlife

Grass snake

protected speciesa few records
Most records: Jun.
About the species

A harmless snake with two yellow spots on the nape. It swims well and hunts frogs, fish and newts.

Eurasian beaverWildlife

Eurasian beaver

protected speciesa few records
Most records: March.
About the species

A herbivore that changes the stream and its banks with dams and burrows. It is protected. It creates shallows and pools where fish and insects thrive.

Black alderPlant

Black alder

many records
Most records: Jul.
About the species

A riparian tree whose roots reach below the water surface.

Japanese knotweedInvasive plant

Japanese knotweed

invasive speciesquite a few records
Most records: October.
About the species

An invasive herb from East Asia that forms dense stands up to three meters tall.

Himalayan balsamInvasive plant

Himalayan balsam

invasive speciesquite a few records
Most records: October.
About the species

An invasive plant from the Himalayas, up to two meters tall, with pink flowers. It overgrows the banks of watercourses.

Common reedPlant

Common reed

quite a few records
Most records: Jul.
About the species

Tall grass that forms extensive reed beds around ponds and on banks.

Broadleaf cattailPlant

Broadleaf cattail

quite a few records
Most records: Jun.
About the species

A wetland plant with a brown cylindrical fruiting spike.

Yellow flag irisPlant

Yellow flag iris

a few records
Most records: April.
About the species

A tall wetland plant with yellow flowers that grows on damp banks.

MosquitoesRisk

Mosquitoes

to be reckoned withquite a few records
Most records: Jun.
How to protect yourself

They breed in standing water, so they are worst around reservoirs, oxbow lakes and floodplain forests, especially at sunset.

How to protect yourself: When fishing in the evening and at night wear long sleeves, repellent and a net. Warmth and humidity after rain speed up mosquito development.

Common viperRisk

Common viper

to be reckoned withprotected speciesa few records
Most records: May.
How to protect yourself

A venomous snake that basks on rocky slopes, in wetlands and at forest edges near water.

How to protect yourself: It is shy and bites only when threatened. On rocky banks do not reach with your hand between the stones, and wear sturdy footwear. After a bite stay calm, do not move the affected limb and call 112.

Gray wolfRisk

Gray wolf

to be reckoned witha single record
Most records: May.
How to protect yourself

A shy predator of the forests. It comes to the water at night and at dusk.

How to protect yourself: Attacks on people are very rare. Keep your camp tidy, do not feed wildlife and keep your dog on a leash.

Giant hogweedRisk

Giant hogweed

to be reckoned withinvasive speciesa single record
Most records: May.
How to protect yourself

An invasive plant that grows along stream banks and on wet meadows. In sunlight its sap causes skin burns.

How to protect yourself: Do not touch it and do not walk through the vegetation. If the sap gets on your skin, wash it off with water and soap and protect the area from the sun. See a doctor for larger burns.

Wild boarRisk

Wild boar

to be reckoned witha single record
Most records: September.
How to protect yourself

It comes to the water to wallow and drink, mainly at dusk and at night.

How to protect yourself: A wild boar sow with piglets can be aggressive. Keep your distance, do not spend the night on a game trail and do not leave food scraps near the water.

Wildlife, plants and hazards: records come from observations and also reflect where observers move around; they are not density measurements or a guarantee of an encounter. They apply to the surroundings of about 35 × 55 km.

Photo credits

Animal and plant catalog

Source: GBIFUpdated 6 Nov 2026 16:15

Other fishing districts nearby

Fishing districts on the same watercourse and the nearest fishing districts in the river basin
Fishing districts6